Friday, June 6, 2008

How to Store Worm Castings / Vermicompost

In order to talk about optimal storage and moisture conditions for the finished product of a worm bin we first need to be on the same page as regards the nature of that finished product.

The material harvested from a "finished" worm bin is generally called vermicompost , and is a mixture of earthworm castings (earthworm poop), decomposed organic matter that did not pass through the gut of the worm (compost), and partially decomposed/undecomposed organic matter that is still (somewhat) recognizable. In most situations it is castings that comprise the bulk of the material, usually around 70-80% of the total, dependant upon system type, management method and residence time in the system.

Castings (also called casts and vermicast) are, as stated above, the manure of the earthworm, meaning they are the waste material generated after the worms have processed the organic matter through their gut. Castings are collected by sifting the vermicompost through a series of mesh screens, typically beginning with a 1/2" mesh, with the material that falls through then screened through a 1/4" mesh. Some castings producers screen the material that falls through the 1/4" mesh through a 1/8" mesh to produce an exceptionally fine, uniform material, but it is generally accepted that the material sifted through the 1/4"mesh is nearly pure earthworm castings.

Optimal storage methods will be influenced by whether one is storing earthworm castings or vermicompost.

Before discussing storage methods, it may be wise to reiterate that castings are not necessarily superior to vermicompost! There is some research and a great deal of anecdotal evidence suggesting that, all things being equal, vermicompost produces a better over-all plant growth response than does pure castings. It is believed that the varied particles size, water-holding ability, and level of stability in vermicompost more closely mirrors that of the active fraction of soil, creating a resource that well supports a wide variety of beneficial organisms, and better aids in the formation of good tilth than does uniformly sized, dense, stable castings. Further, all animals excrete excess salts through their manures, and earthworm are no different. Earthworm castings can be and usually are very high in salt relative to good soil, and, at sufficiently high concentrations in a growig medium, can cause plant damage due to salt toxicity. Vermicompost, by virtue of its lower castings volume, tends to have a lower salt level, and it is believed that the compost component may act as a salt buffer, further ameliorating any potential salt issues. Vermicompost is also not so dense as are castings, ensuring optimal oxygen and water penetration into the growth medium.

The take-home message is, castings are not better than vermicompost!


The additional steps taken by castings producers to ensure they package (essentially) pure castings is a marketing issue, not necessarily one of efficacy. For reasons surpassing understanding, the average gardener erroneously believes that soils and soil amendments that are fine and uniformly sized are generally superior to chunky, somewhat irregular materials. The size uniformity of screened castings appeals to most gardeners, thus castings producers give the gardening public what they want, not what is necessarily most beneficial to the plant or soil. This is a marketing decision, not one based on product performance.

It should be noted, too, that because of their stability, earthworm castings are a somewhat more predictable material than is vermicompost. By screening vermicompost to (essentially) pure castings the castings producer can ensure that each bag sold contains a product with a known chemical and biological character, and a relatively reliable plant growth impact.

Another issue associated with the sale of vermicompost is its stability and how it must or should be stored, and this leads us back to the original topic.

The undecomposed and partially decomposed organic materials in vermicompost continue to break down during storage. Placing actively decomposing organic materials in an airtight container encourages anaerobic organisms to take over decomposition with their cadre of foul-smelling, plant-toxic by-products; and drying vermicompost halts decomposition, and often causes some polymerization, meaning the material becomes impossible to re-wet (hydrophobic). What all of this means is that if one is storing vermicompost it is best to first dry it down so that it is damp, not wet, thus ensuring sufficient air penetration through the material to prevent anaerobia; and keep it in a non -airtight container. Stored in this way the vermicompost slowly stabilizes in an aerobic environment and has a shelf life of more than three years.

If one is storing castings, things become much less management intensive. Because castings are essentially stable they can be both stored in airtight packages and dried to 5% moisture with no loss of plant growth impact.

It is typically the differences between vermicompost and castings that lead to what appear to be conflicting recomendations in storage practices. If you are unsure whether you are dealing with castings are vermicompost in your system, simply seal a small handful in an airtight plastic bag, and after a few days, open it up and take a big ol' sniff. If it smells like soil, you're dealing with castings that can continue being stored in an airtight container. If it smells like ammonia, a sewer, vomit, vinegar, a dead body,or generally causes you to turn your head and say something best not said in the presence of a three year old, well, you probably get the idea...

Copyright Wormswrangler.com 2007, design by WW/BR

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Manual Of On-Farm Vermicomposting and Vermiculture

Satu manual yang saya rasa amat berfaedah dan berguna untuk dijadikan sebagai bahan rujukan penternak dan bakal penternak cacing ;

www.allthingsorganic.com/pdf/Vermiculture_FarmersManual_gm.pdf


Saturday, April 26, 2008

Pengiraan C / N Bahan Makanan

Table 3. Characteristics of common composting materials

Material

Nitrogen (dry weight) (%)

C:N (dry weight)

Moisture Content (%)

Bulk Density @Moisture Content (kg/m3)

Beef

- Feedlot with bedding

1.3

1.8

68

710

Dairy

- Solid manure handling

1.7

18

79

710

- Liquid slurry

2.40 - 3.60

16

88 – 92

990

- Solids separated from slurry

1.45

23

77

650

Pigs

- Liquid slurry

0.15 - 5.00

20

93 - 99

1000

- Solids separated from slurry

0.35 - 5.00

1.9

75 – 80

270 - 860

Poultry

- Broiler breeder layer

3.6

10

46

470

- Broiler litter

4.7

15

25

330

- Turkey litter

4.2

14

33

380

Horse Manure with Bedding

1.40 - 2.30

22 - 50

59 – 79

725 - 960

- with straw

1.5

27

67

-

- with shavings

0.9

65

72

-

Sheep Manure

1.30 - 3.09

13 – 20

60 – 75

-

Straw

- general straw

0.30 - 1.10

48 - 150

27-Apr

58 - 357

- oat straw

0.60 - 1.10

48 – 98

14

130 - 192

- wheat straw

0.30 - 0.50

100 - 150

10

135

- barley straw

0.75 - 0.78

-

18-Dec

-

Legume Grass Hay

1.80 - 3.60

15 – 19

10 – 30

-

Cardboard

0.1

563

8

154

Leaves 0.50

1.3

40 – 80

38

60 - 80

Paper

0.20 - 0.25

127 – 178

18 – 20

130

Sawdust

0.06 - 0.80

200 – 750

19 – 65

207 - 267

Woodwaste (Chips)

0.04 - 0.23

212 – 1313

15 – 40

264 - 368

Blending Sample Calculation


Appendix A1



Symbols



a

= total weight of ingredient a



b

= total weight of ingredient b



c

= total weight of ingredient c



M

= desired mix moisture content



Ma, Mb, Mc…

= moisture content of ingredients a, b, c



%Ca, %Cb, %Cc…

= % carbon of ingredients a, b, c… (on dry weight basis)



%Na, %Nb, %Nc…

= % nitrogen of ingredients a, b, c,… (on dry weight basis)



R

= desired C:N ratio of mix



Ra, Rb

= C:N ratio of ingredients a, b, c



.



Appendix A2



Formulas for Only Two Ingredients



Required amount of ingredient a per kg b



To obtain desired C:N ratio:

a = % Nb x (R-Rb) x (1-Mb)
.>..% Na (Ra-R) (1-Ma)



.



To obtain desired moisture content:

a = Mb-M
.>..M-Ma



.



Appendix A3



Formulas for a Mix of Materials



C:N ratio

= weight of C in ingredient a + weight of C in b + weight of C in c +…
.>...>..weight of N in a + weight of N in b + weight of N in c +…

= [%Ca x a x (1-Ma)] + [%Cb x b x (1-Mb)] + [%Cc x c x (1-Mc)]
> [%Na x a x (1-Ma)] + [%Nb x b x (1-Mb)] + [%Nc x c x (1-Mc)]



.



Moisture content

= weight of water in ingredient a + weight of water in b + weight of water in c + .

total weight of all ingredients

= (a x Ma) + (b x Mb) + (c x Mc) …
.>...>.>....a + b + c + ...0


Example

Assume a broiler breeder farm has manure to compost and that sawdust will be used as a bulking agent. How much sawdust and water needs to be added to the manure to have a good compost mix?

Step 1. Determine the approximate nitrogen, carbon, moisture, and bulk density from Table 3 in Chapter 2.

Material

Nitrogen (dry weight) (%)

C:N
(dry weight)

Moisture Content
(%)

Bulk Density @ Moisture Content(kg/m3)

Broiler Breeder Manure

3.60

10

46

470

Sawdust

0.06 - 0.80

200 - 750

19 - 65

207 - 267

Note: For a range of numbers, take the average if there has been no analysis performed.

Sawdust

0.43

475

42

237

. Step 2. Using the formula for two ingredients from Table 3, determine the amount of sawdust (a) needed for each kg of manure, (b) to give a desired C:N ratio (R) of 30.

Given:

b.
Ma.
Mb.
Ra.
Rb.
%Na.
%Nb.

= 1 kg of broiler breeder manure
= 0.20 (for this example 20% was selected)
= 0.46 (46% moisture content of manure )
= 500 (for this example C:N of 500 was selected)
= 10 (C:N ratio of manure)
= 0.1 (for this example 0.1% was selected)
= 3.6 (% nitrogen in manure)

Determine:

a (weight of sawdust needed) for the desired C:N ratio of R = 30
a = %Nb x (R-Rb) x (1-Mb)
.....%Na (Ra-R) (1-Ma)

(Appendix A2)

Calculation:

a = 3.6 x (30-10) x (1-0.46) = 1.0
.....0.1 (500-30) (1-0.20)

Answer:

For each kg of manure, add 1.0 kg of sawdust to obtain a C:N ratio of 30.












.

Step 3. Check the mix moisture content (M.C.) using the moisture content formula in Appendix A2.

Given:

a.
b.
Ma.
Mb.

= 1.0 kg weight of sawdust from Step 2
= 1.0 kg weight of manure
= 0.20 (for this example 20% was selected)
= 0.46 (46% moisture content of manure)

Determine:

M.C. (mix moisture content)
M.C. = (a x Ma) + (b x Mb)
..................a + b

(Appendix A3)

Calculation:

M.C. = (1 x 0.20) + (1 x 0.46) = 0.33 or 33 %
........................1 + 1

Answer:

This starting moisture content of 33% is too low, since ideal moisture content runs from 50 to 60%.

Step 4. Adjust moisture content to 55% using the two-ingredient formula from Appendix A2.

Given:

b.
M.
Ma.
Mb.

= 1 kg of manure/sawdust mix
= 0.55 (55% desired moisture content)
= 1.0 (100% moisture content of water)
= 0.33 (33% moisture content of manure/sawdust mix)

Determine:

‘a’ quantity of water required
a = Mb - M
......M - Ma

Calculation:

a = 0.33 - 0.55 = 0.49
......0.55 - 1.00

Answer:

Add 0.49 kg of water for every 1.0 kg of manure/sawdust mix.

. Step 5. Determine how much manure, sawdust and water to mix.

Given:

Tractor bucket volume = 2.0 m3
Manure bulk density = 470 kg/m3
Sawdust bulk density = 207 kg/m3

Determine:

Volume of manure, sawdust, and water

Calculation:

One bucket of manure weighs 2.0 m3 x 470 kg/m3 = 940 kg
Since an equal weight of manure and sawdust is wanted, add 940 kg of sawdust or 940 kg / 207 kg/m3 = 4.54 m3 of sawdust
This is equal to 4.54 m3 / 2.0 m3 per bucket = 2.27 buckets of sawdust
For each bucket of manure used, there will be a total manure/sawdust mix weighing
940 kg + 940 kg = 1840 kg
Similarly, for each bucket of manure used, add:
0.49 kg of water / kg of mix x 1840 kg = 902 kg of water (902 L of water)

Answer:

For each bucket of manure, add 2.27 buckets of sawdust and 902 litres of water.